Meet the team
Entercept's credibility rests on the judgement of the people who set its methods. Here they are, and here is how the work is kept independent of them.
Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer
Ibrahim leads Entercept's strategy, partnerships and regulatory engagement. He works directly with compliance leaders, risk committees and supervisory bodies to define what credible, independent assurance for high-risk AI has to look like, and holds the company to that standard as it scales.
LinkedIn profile for Ibrahim Olaosebikan (opens in a new tab)Co-Founder & Chief Technology Officer
Temitayo leads engineering across the assessment engine, detector framework and evidence pipeline. His focus is reproducibility: every finding Entercept publishes has to be traceable to a recorded observation, a versioned method and a verifiable chain of evidence.
LinkedIn profile for Temitayo Abiona (opens in a new tab)Co-Founder & Chief Quality Officer
Moruf owns assessment quality and methodology governance. He brings decades of quality systems and process assurance practice to the review of Entercept's methods, ensuring conclusions are defensible under audit, regulatory scrutiny and independent challenge.
LinkedIn profile for Moruf Olaosebikan (opens in a new tab)How the work is governed
A small team can still be independent, provided the separation is built into how the work runs rather than left to good intentions.
The people who scope and sell an engagement do not decide what a finding says. Methodology sits with quality, not with commercial.
Detectors, thresholds and report structure are versioned and reviewed before they are used on a live system, and every run records the version applied.
Where a reviewer exercises discretion, the rationale goes into the audit trail alongside the result, so the decision can be examined later.
See how independent, evidence-backed assurance works on a real high-risk AI system, then get an audit-ready report your regulators, board and customers can rely on.