Sectors
Where independent assurance is already expected
Each of these sectors deploys AI in decisions that materially affect people. That is precisely where supervisors, auditors and buyers now ask for external evidence.
Sectors we serve
Financial Services
Credit decisioning, fraud scoring and customer risk models sit inside high-risk classifications and consumer protection duties. We assess them for fairness, robustness and explainability, and produce evidence your supervisors and internal audit function can rely on.
Systems assessed
- Credit decisioning
- Fraud detection
- AML screening
- Pricing models
Primary regimes
- EU AI Act Annex III(5)
- UK GDPR Arts. 22A to 22D
- FCA Consumer Duty
Healthcare
Diagnostic support, triage and patient-risk stratification carry direct safety consequences. Assessments cover performance across patient subgroups, failure behaviour at the edges, and the quality of the human oversight arrangements around the system.
Systems assessed
- Diagnostic support
- Triage
- Risk stratification
- Clinical documentation
Primary regimes
- EU AI Act Annex III(5)
- UK GDPR Art. 9
- MDR and UKCA context
Insurance
Pricing, underwriting and claims-handling models decide who gets cover and on what terms. Entercept tests for proxy discrimination and unstable behaviour, and records the evidence needed to answer both regulators and complainants.
Systems assessed
- Underwriting
- Risk pricing
- Claims triage
- Fraud analytics
Primary regimes
- EU AI Act Annex III(5)(c)
- UK GDPR Art. 5(1)(a)
- Equality Act 2010
Government
AI used in eligibility, enforcement and resource allocation must withstand judicial review, freedom of information requests and parliamentary scrutiny. Entercept produces the independent record that makes those decisions explicable.
Systems assessed
- Eligibility
- Case prioritisation
- Resource allocation
- Enforcement triage
Primary regimes
- EU AI Act Annex III(5)(a)
- UK GDPR
- Public law duties
Human Resources
Screening, ranking and performance systems are explicitly high-risk and attract close scrutiny from candidates, works councils and regulators. Assessments cover adverse impact, transparency to candidates and the reality of human review.
Systems assessed
- CV screening
- Candidate ranking
- Performance analytics
- Workforce planning
Primary regimes
- EU AI Act Annex III(4)
- UK GDPR Arts. 22A to 22D
- Equality Act 2010
Public Sector
Local authorities, education and essential-services providers deploy AI where the people affected have no alternative. Entercept assesses these systems against both regulatory obligations and the transparency expectations placed on public bodies.
Systems assessed
- Benefits
- Education placement
- Housing allocation
- Service routing
Primary regimes
- EU AI Act Annex III(5)
- UK GDPR
- Algorithmic transparency standards
How an engagement runs
One assessment core, applied to your context
Sector overlays change which obligations are tested and how findings are framed. The independence, the evidence discipline and the integrity guarantees never change.
See the assessment stages- 01
A scoped assessment agreed against your specific deployment context
- 02
Sector overlays applied on top of the core regulatory mapping
- 03
An independent report written for your regulator, board and customers
- 04
Re-assessment triggered when the model, data or rules change
Ready to see Entercept in action?
See how independent, evidence-backed assurance works on a real high-risk AI system, then get an audit-ready report your regulators, board and customers can rely on.